The twists of the case allows Wikileaks by Perrine Créquy of food for thought on how to "exercise of economic intelligence. "
Simple posture for some, state of mind to others, public policy for others, strategic function within the company for those wishing to make their profession, academic discipline for those who want to advance their teaching methods and ..., fuzzy concept no doubt, the intelligence seems elusive. Its nature and in fact seems as imprecise as its scope, covering a wide range from documentary to watch the influence through the strategy and the protection of secrecy, is great.
Here it is now promoted to the rank of quality: there is evidence of intelligence (EI) as shown bravery or generosity, or as we could show, conversely, stupidity Economic (BE). Not sure that this profession, whose practitioners now have a union to represent them, it becomes clearer.
Economic intelligence, "this terminology misnomer because few explicit", as recognized by Olivier Buquen the interministerial delegate in charge of the case (D2IE), does she deserve to be not suitable because they can be changed? As I suggested in my previous post , it could be reserved for public policy advocated by Bernard Carayon (and implemented by the interministerial delegate), while "the use of intelligence" (or useful information ) may designate the academic discipline (and profession) and the "Business Intelligence" (or business information), its declination in business.
FB
0 comments:
Post a Comment