How To Reduce Bilirubin Total

vs. Public Safety Private Security

According to a dispatch AFP November 27 signed Cyril Touaux , " earlier job cuts in the police and the gendarmerie, the private security companies are booming, raising fears to some creeping privatization of security . This debate on shared public-private security is interesting because it touches the very foundations of the concept same State and proportion in which can to delegate his monopoly on the legitimate use of violence to the words of Max Weber .

The goal of private companies "is not the general interest", but " make money," laments Nicolas Comte Secretary General USGP of working-Force Police, fearing a a "territorial division between police and private companies." Of course, concern for the general good is not the private side. Should we all refrain from any discussion on shared public-private limited to this single criterion of interest? The private is itself subject to the imperative of efficiency or profitability, which is equally important and not necessarily antithetical to the public interest. Public service, meanwhile, is not infallible guarantee of maximum interest. If its effectiveness proved weak or no public interest just got lost, and it is rather the particular interest of officials underemployed prevail even when unnecessary.


According the union Alliance, second union peacekeepers, very positive about him at this public-private co-production, we must "refocus police and gendarmes on their core business ", namely" public safety, public order , police and intelligence "and" transfer "to" other duties "to" other actors security ". Therein lies perhaps the criterion of choice between public and private, which would leave the public safety of the public domain, and delegate to the private one on private property. The criterion seems quite logical and simple to apply with respect to the "public safety" and "public order", and so is for everything related to the "thing" judicial field undeniably regal.


Regarding intelligence, the criterion is fully applicable particularly important to take into account, provided it clear that this is intelligence. It goes without saying, moreover, since the security intelligence or information of interest criminal justice is therefore actually in judicial affairs. Security intelligence reports to the royal domain and can under no circumstances be delegated to private actors .


This requirement does nothing yet, the "Business Intelligence "information as the preferred official language of wood ignore, but whose reality is not reflected in the term more "sleep" as in that of economic 'intelligence. "The intelligence business, which has nothing to do with the security intelligence service is the corporate strategy that rests solely with the company and therefore the private sector if it is private.


This observation is important because it implies necessarily good mark the difference between security and business intelligence. The company has been in charge of his private security, which applies throughout his private right in which public safety is not intended to intervene. The information that should intervene in security in the context of court cases there is normally no place.


FB

Virtue Theory And Abortion Summary

"The art of dogma in Business Intelligence and Strategic .... "Interview

To avoid frustration an intelligence operation without ...

Find this article in L'Usine Nouvelle dated December 2008 that I found by browsing through my notes which I took the title. From Michel Iwochewitsch, associate director of Strateco, a consulting company in strategy, this analysis without concessions attributed the difficulties encountered by economic and strategic intelligence (ISI) in excess of dogmatism in the profession. I found many ideas with pleasure that I stand for "intelligence culture" I think it necessary to change by strengthening its theoretical basis.

Among the doctrines that he denounces include " most famous as the intelligence cycle! Beautiful "theory" ... But so far from Reality! , with a concomitant "conspicuously absent cycle, the end customer . "Let's be clear " he says, " cycle illustrates the different functions of an organic military intelligence service ... "," leave the cycle to its original role: a simple descriptive organic! .

Other dogma Iwochewitsch pinned by Michel, who says that " IES is to collect information for the decision maker . It " limit the effect of IES minor tasks such as collecting information ", "collection facilitating the emergence of our profession through like barbouzerie and other crossings yellow line ... . The example of the so encouraged " collection of human origin " contributes "to IES mere rumors multiply manifold interactions with the sole purpose" to garner "information "Job he likens to the" gossip "(he uses the English word for it gossiper that can be translated as" gossip "). To conclude on this dogma, Iwochewitsch quotes in English an American analyst whose sentence could be translated as: "The collection without exploitation, it's like foreplay without orgasm, just a little more frustration! .

Other dogma although he advises to forget "this pseudo omniscience IES " which "leads the practitioners to "invest" in many related fields such as security, lobbying, influence, communication, marketing, strategy, etc.. . "Yes ," he says, " IES can support these processes in many ways, but no, the practitioner is not an expert in these fields! . Lobbying is taken as an example: " IES is essential to bring the value-added information in a device of lobbying, which in itself is a decision process, but in any case, a specialist in IES is able in turn to mount a lobbying operation! He knows nothing of the methods and techniques lobbyist. The same applies to other areas of information. " let us focus on our core business ," he adds, " offer companies and operational methodologies that aim to bring the value-added information and streamlines decision-making through it! .

I found satisfaction with at Michel Iwochewitsch many ideas I raised in my Articles about some "intelligence culture" I think it necessary to change by strengthening its theoretical foundation: the inadequacy of the intelligence cycle as taught in textbooks, confusion between intelligence gathering (mostly related to espionage) and intelligence, the importance of the operation, the confusion between the operational business intelligence that aims to enlighten and intelligence function itself.

Iwochewitsch we book Michel concluded his own conception of intelligence, that we can discuss, but is nonetheless original and interesting to analyze. It does not seem at first a radical departure from the definition that is made in the report Marten, but differs in that it still is restricted to addressing the threats. According to him, " IES approach is fundamentally a risk . The craft, " when integrated into the decision process of the enterprise is indeed a risk management activity (...) by analyzing a situation informational made available to a process decision. " " Neither more nor less ... "he adds," and this is in itself an art - complex - and full! .

strategy with much needed information on threats as opportunities, this restriction in the management of risks does not seem to have applied to intelligence in general, but this presentation is nevertheless important merit to draw attention to the notion of risk that is specific to the scope of the strategy and, consequently, the intelligence that illuminates it. Intelligence aims, providing useful information to decision in action to help reduce the risks inherent in any activity conducted in an uncertain environment.

When handling the theoretical concepts for studying the processes involved in developing intelligence, it is often necessary to make the connection with scientific research and interest in the epistemology . What distinguishes the intelligence of scientific research, which both meet a need of knowledge and involve similar mechanisms intellectuals, it is probably this characteristic that has to apply to activities performed in an uncertain environment, so hostile, where the risk is a major part . This finding that the perception of the IES by confirms Iwochewitsch Michel, is the originality of the information considered subject to scientific research, which appears as the field of academic study beyond the strict confines of epistemology.

The author summarizes by saying that " IES is basically a" tool "like other cutting tools - HR strategy, lobbying, legal, etc.. - Which allows a company to receive a contribution of informational quality from various sources . But, he adds, " unlike other disciplines transverse IES now suffers from the fragility of its foundations: some R & D, a methodological body undefined, no publications scientists, etc.. .

To avoid frustration an intelligence without exploitation, which would be like without these preliminary orgasm, we wish, with Michel Iwochewitsch, the university looks finally to the exploitation of intelligence as the true object of research truly distinct from epistemology, its techniques and its original methods as its difficulty in adapting to technical operational current turmoil.

FB

Read the article by Michel Iwochewitsch

Harley Davidson Shower Curtin

sakebar.fr - Sale of Liquor Japanese sake, shochu and whiskey

Here is a nice online store created with CMS PrestaShop.
www.sakebar.fr

Difference Between Rat And Fox Terrier

Read Jacques Breillat among , "Intelligence and Intelligence: An interview with Francis Beau" into two parts ( 1 / 2 ) and ( 2 / 2 ) . This interview brings to develop the necessary distinction between intelligence and espionage, to clarify the conditions for use underground, trying to explain the unfortunate confusion between business intelligence, espionage and information security, to stress instead essential operations, and to differentiate intelligence of anticipation.