According to a dispatch AFP November 27 signed Cyril Touaux , " earlier job cuts in the police and the gendarmerie, the private security companies are booming, raising fears to some creeping privatization of security . This debate on shared public-private security is interesting because it touches the very foundations of the concept same State and proportion in which can to delegate his monopoly on the legitimate use of violence to the words of Max Weber .
The goal of private companies "is not the general interest", but " make money," laments Nicolas Comte Secretary General USGP of working-Force Police, fearing a a "territorial division between police and private companies." Of course, concern for the general good is not the private side. Should we all refrain from any discussion on shared public-private limited to this single criterion of interest? The private is itself subject to the imperative of efficiency or profitability, which is equally important and not necessarily antithetical to the public interest. Public service, meanwhile, is not infallible guarantee of maximum interest. If its effectiveness proved weak or no public interest just got lost, and it is rather the particular interest of officials underemployed prevail even when unnecessary.
According the union Alliance, second union peacekeepers, very positive about him at this public-private co-production, we must "refocus police and gendarmes on their core business ", namely" public safety, public order , police and intelligence "and" transfer "to" other duties "to" other actors security ". Therein lies perhaps the criterion of choice between public and private, which would leave the public safety of the public domain, and delegate to the private one on private property. The criterion seems quite logical and simple to apply with respect to the "public safety" and "public order", and so is for everything related to the "thing" judicial field undeniably regal.
Regarding intelligence, the criterion is fully applicable particularly important to take into account, provided it clear that this is intelligence. It goes without saying, moreover, since the security intelligence or information of interest criminal justice is therefore actually in judicial affairs. Security intelligence reports to the royal domain and can under no circumstances be delegated to private actors .
This requirement does nothing yet, the "Business Intelligence "information as the preferred official language of wood ignore, but whose reality is not reflected in the term more "sleep" as in that of economic 'intelligence. "The intelligence business, which has nothing to do with the security intelligence service is the corporate strategy that rests solely with the company and therefore the private sector if it is private.
This observation is important because it implies necessarily good mark the difference between security and business intelligence. The company has been in charge of his private security, which applies throughout his private right in which public safety is not intended to intervene. The information that should intervene in security in the context of court cases there is normally no place.
FB
0 comments:
Post a Comment