The title of an interview with Frederick Saffroy , published January 7, 2010 by blog EasyBourse and directed by Nabil by Bourassa, is indicative of the confusion between intelligence and industrial espionage. Following the interview confirms this confusion, as many other items in response to the Renault affair reflected in the news.
dint confuse the security requirement inherent in any strategic activity, with the intelligence function or intelligence (use of information useful to economic players as defined by the Fisher report), it comes naturally to reduce economic intelligence in any activity competitive heritage protection against the threats of industrial espionage, as companies must learn to cope with more vigilance.
(*) Eric Besson, Minister of Industry, Energy and the Digital Economy, guest RTL January 6, 2010, about the espionage case in Renault: " it illustrates once again the risks to our business in industrial espionage, economic intelligence as we say today . How can we think that the confusion between "intelligence" and "espionage" can not be completely trivialized when the minister himself is the confusion?
How to avoid these conditions in a regional newspaper published a front page article began: "The intelligence economic or industrial espionage ..." (Hubert Besson Intelligence : these businesses under surveillance Yonne, Yonne Republican edition of January 11, 2010)?
What is the title that simply reducing the function of the conditions of its realization, is transformed from reading the article into a real confusion over the issues asked, because of economic intelligence and industrial espionage two notions are perfectly interchangeable. Witness this last question, seeking to identify the economic sectors most affected by industrial espionage, is thus formulated: "Is there sectors favored by the intelligence? .
can see in this example (from the recent past gives us many more) * a demonstration of disintegration of the intelligence found in my previous post, which gradually removes exploitation of useful information (research, processing and distribution), activity yet essential function according to the report Marten, confusing the need for security with the function itself, to make one of three pillars of the discipline.
FB
FB
(*) Eric Besson, Minister of Industry, Energy and the Digital Economy, guest RTL January 6, 2010, about the espionage case in Renault: " it illustrates once again the risks to our business in industrial espionage, economic intelligence as we say today . How can we think that the confusion between "intelligence" and "espionage" can not be completely trivialized when the minister himself is the confusion?
How to avoid these conditions in a regional newspaper published a front page article began: "The intelligence economic or industrial espionage ..." (Hubert Besson Intelligence : these businesses under surveillance Yonne, Yonne Republican edition of January 11, 2010)?
0 comments:
Post a Comment